Project:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Indo-Pakistani war of 1965
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to File:Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 23:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Indo-Pakistani war of 1965[change]
- Indo-Pakistani war of 1965 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Heavy POV pushing, it neither cites neutral sources nor neutral views, the entire conclusion of the article is based on what Pakistani media thinks and portrays Mr.Hanes (talk) 08:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change]
- I currently don't see a strong bias in the article. Perhaps all that's left is to replace indian-occupied K. b indian-administered K. (no idea what a neutral term is), and pperhaps add a sentence in what way India believes it won the war. But neither point is one that we need to discuss at RfD...--Eptalon (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- File:Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Some POV, but not enough that would warrant deleting the article. Pulling in the nuanced description of the result from enwiki's article would help. Ravensfire (talk) 22:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- File:Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Article also available in En Wikipedia. --Symonds Gerother (talk) 04:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.