Project:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Battl Victory Records
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to File:Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:08, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Battl Victory Records[change]
- Battl Victory Records (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from enwiki but not complex, so not an A3. This appears to fail WP:GNG, I can only find primary sources - and that is why the draft for this topic on enwiki has been declined so many times. --Ferien (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change]
- It has not been copied. After creating the Simple English Wikipedia, I expanded the English Wiki. A label has the obligation to hand over everything it publishes, whether digital or physical, to the national libraries. It is also necessary to clarify which category a label falls under. It's a music company, but the charts can no longer be used as a reference as they have been proven to be manipulated. As a company, it should definitely be enough that Battl Victory Records is named and listed in the National Library in Germany and also in the Sigel-Staatsbibliothek. Likewise in MusicBrainz. Likewise, the amount of releases I could find is also sufficient in my opinion.
- I'm not very experienced when it comes to deletion requests and where do I have to insert this {{wait}} or make a non-deletion request? DayforDay (talk) 06:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DayforDay As Ferien has opened a deletion request, you can no longer use {{wait}} to hold off the deletion process. It was meant to be placed on the article below the quick deletion template. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 07:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Symbol delete vote.svg Delete - The general notability guidelines require independent, significant and reliable references to establish notability. I do not see a lot of that in the article. Most of them are primary sources, which are not independent of the subject, or are database listings, which are not significant enough to establish notability.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 07:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.