Project:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Global Association of Economics Education
Appearance
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to File:Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Global Association of Economics Education[change]
- Global Association of Economics Education (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Camouflaged Mirage has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested QD (I tagged A4,G11) per reasons here. Delete Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change]
- File:Symbol comment vote.svg Comment: Do also refer to the commentary by Billinghurst at Talk:Global Association of Economics Education.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- During my studies (In the 1990s, and 2000s), I saw AIESEC, as one organisation of several, who organized student parties with an "internatiional flair". If I believe Wikipedia, AIESEC was founded during or shortly after World War II. Sometimes AIESEC co-organised talks with a well-known speaker, but that's not what I remember them for. At the time I studied, work was done mostly by volunteers, and AIESEC had existed for roughly 50 years. If I look at the orgiabisation mentioned above, they were less than 10 years ago, and probably work along the same lines. For this reason, I think, that there was not enough time to develop notability, the same way AIESEC has in its 50-odd years of existence. What we have here should live as a section in the AIESEC article, perhaps with an additional redirect. --Eptalon (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - cited sources are all either non-independent or non-significant coverage. Chenzw Talk 13:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete due to the lack of proper secondary sources. I don't think making a section and redirecting it to AIESEC is a good idea since they are two different organizations and it looks like AIESEC has many partners so a section about this one is unnecessary.--BRP ever 23:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 11:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.