Project:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/Charles Sturt University

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to File:Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Chenzw Talk 15:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Charles Sturt University[change]

Charles Sturt University (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Krett12 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Very short article. Probably meets the criteria for Quick Deletion, but I think they had good intentions so I'm starting an RfD instead. Krett12 (talk) 23:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change]

Comment. Being short is not a reason to delete an article. If it were, we wouldn't have stub pages. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, but stub pages are longer than this. This is one sentence. Krett12 (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

There is no minimum length for stubs. They can certainly be this short. An example is all those "X is a place in Y" articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep We should improve, not delete pages such as this. Only (talk) 02:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

If it gets improved noticably within the next week, I will vote for keep. I'm not sure if I'm allowed to do this, but if I am, I might even withdraw the whole rfd. Krett12 (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

It wouldn't make sense for you to "vote" on an RfD that you started, but the rules allow for you to withdraw the request under certain circumstances (including the reason for deletion being resolved). --Auntof6 (talk) 05:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

The creator can't vote? Then why create it? Computer Fizz (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Creator's "vote" is the initial nomination. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy keep. Notability criteria for educational institutions follow enwiki. So see en:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES: "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are usually kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists." StevenJ81 (talk) 15:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.