Jump to content

Project:Requests for checkuser/Archives/2024-02

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rara Lie[change]

Both of these editors have recently called me out as an LTA and both very shortly after creating their accounts. See here and here. Now, I just got a message on my TP that my username does not meet the policies of a username (Same thing Rara Lie immediately posted about on the boards). File:Cyberduck icon.png Looks like a duck to me If confirmed, request a glock as well.Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 20:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi CUs. To give you an update the 2nd account was globally locked and a global steward posted this on my request. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 13:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
File:X mark.svg Not done Nothing to do here. Operator873 connect 23:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

0ddotnek[change]

after 0ddotnek was blocked Enujrecneps and Moskcorbenuj appeared on articles where 0ddotnek was editing: June_Spencer and Ethel_Caterham. The socks overlap at Roger_Brocksom too.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed belonging to Locked LTA Operator873 connect 19:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Premaledu[change]

Something does not seem right as they just created their account and immediately moved to AN to have a religious user name blocked (no edits since January 2023). Now they are telling me to read the policy on usernames. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 15:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Btw, only having one account on a CU request is called a fishing expedition and isn't allowed. RiggedMint 15:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
@RiggedMint I’m aware of the policy, it reminds me of someone a couple years back who did the same thing and got cu blocked for evasion. Our CUs can figure it out quick. I can’t remember every single account that’s been blocked as no else can either. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 15:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Clarification about offensive username. is the topic. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 15:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
We need more to go on than this. fr33kman 22:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
@Fr33kman You can put this aside. I’ll have to search for who I think it is. However I am recommending they be blocked. If you look at the user contributions they are going to different wikis and doing the exact same thing and asking for that user to be blocked. I am going to post to SRG as well for a Glock. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 22:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Glock requested. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 22:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Symbol comment vote.svg Comment: User is glocked. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 11:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Dlgort[change]

New spammer accounts. See else en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Papa2004. Кронас (talk) 10:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC) ‎

No relationship fr33kman 22:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

New spammer accounts[change]

New accounts from cross-wiki abuser "Papa2004". Кронас (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't see an IP overlap, so based on IP evidence, not the same user... Eptalon (talk) 16:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

0ddotnek[change]

This user just created their account, however, the articles they are editing have not been touched in a while. Numerous IPs were editing it and they all ended up being blocked by User:Vermont for long term abuse. The behavior of this editor matches that of the IP as they are making many small changes over a long period of time. Due to the changes they are making on the couple of articles I’m of the belief they are related to the blocked IP listed as follows (I understand comments cannot be made about IPs by a CU):

  • 82.132.234.102

Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 09:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

I have blocked the account indefinitely. No comment on relation w/ IP. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 15:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Tanzimat accounts[change]

These 5 accounts we're all created recently editing the same page, at the same time. I think the accounts were editing in good faith but editing on multiple accounts at the same time breaks some alt account guidelines. RiggedMint 16:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Considering Tnalbantian's userpage, it's likely a group of students. If they're editing in good faith I don't think there's much point in looking into this further. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 15:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
If that's the case, then I'll dismiss the topic. RiggedMint 15:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
@Vermont Should it be suggested about the school project and how to register? I would also find it odd, as Rigged did. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 16:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

FireVerse accounts[change]

We have 2 accounts created at similar timing and working on 1 page. Bennyhenny876 made the article and Johnone9000 is working to remove the RFD tag. Can this be teamwork? MathXplore (talk) 14:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed exact match. Operator873 connect 19:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

The account creators[change]

TAC was created on January 10 with no edits until today. They created an article which was already deleted at RfD. The bot676 was globally locked for lock evasion on February 18th. I am pretty sure this is a huge File:Cyberduck icon.png Looks like a duck to me based on behavior. May also want to check for sleepers. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 17:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Cu sees no relationship. fr33kman 09:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Beautiful than the BEAUTIFUL[change]

I think the users page User:Beautiful than the BEAUTIFUL pretty much says it all. They admit they are blocked and creating many accounts. On the user page they have “How many times do you bully me here?” Btw they admit on the talk page that the other account is theirs and they are here “…I just want to report MathXplore he want to delete someones Article”. Pretty clear case to me. I recommend checking for sleepers as well. I also think they are behind all the IP creations of the Bautista articles, but I know comments cannot be made on IP. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 17:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't see overlapping IP adresses, so from a CU point of view there is no match, sorry. Eptalon (talk) 19:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
@Eptalon No worries. I find it odd they would make those comments and admit it is their account lol. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 21:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Nameosral ‎[change]

New account, same articles of spammer Papa2004 on en-wiki. Кронас (talk) 20:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

No relationships shown fr33kman 16:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

CleanerWiki and finalizer[change]

They flat out state on their page they are blocked (way it is stated appears to be numerous times). They just created an account and went right to creating an article and was set for QD and they removed it. Using the typical please wait I’ll fix it right now. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 14:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Yes check.svg Done by @Bsadowski1 Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 15:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.nynox.solutions/index.php?title=Project:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-02&oldid=507445"