Project:Requests for adminship/Sir James Paul
Appearance
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Sir James Paul[change]
- Even though I do not have an incredible amount of edits I think I will do a great job as a sysop. The only thing I promise is to work hard. I am a quick learner so if I make a mistake I will not make it again. I have already learned a lot from this election about policies and I will learn more about them--Sir James Paul 20:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. As I said before, you're just not ready to be a sysop yet. A few more months contributing and maybe. Archer7 - talk 20:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, and second everything Archer7 said above. Blockinblox - talk 21:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Oppose because the user has spammed heaps of user talk pages about this nomination. He has even spammed a template (diff). I don't know if that was a mistake or an attempt to get more support from people. Either way, it hasn't worked on me, sorry mate. Also, bans and blocks are both different things, and the fact that they are both used interchangeably by the candidate makes me think that he does not know enough of the policies to be an administrator. J Di 21:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, per everybody else's comments. Especially the spamming of talk pages. PullToOpen Talk 21:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I am a very quick learner. I did not know I was spamming talk pages and will not make that mistake again. I have already become familar with the blocking policies. Even though I will probably lose this will help me in the future, I have already learned a lot. As a sysop if I need help I will ask another sysop.--Sir James Paul 21:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Enthusiastic, but much to learn. History at other wiki projects shows the same (en:Wikipedia and en:Wikiquote) ZimZalaBim 22:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.