Project:Requests for adminship/Pupster21

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Pupster21

Closed early per WP:SNOW.

I have been inactive as of late, I know I'll get heat for that, but I have reverted one edit and have created over 10 pages. Pupster21 12:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Candidate's acceptance:I accept this self-nomination. --Pupster21 12:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

• Oppose. No way do you meet the requirements at this point. You've edited here for 3 days (March 26th and 27th and today). I suggest we close per WP:SNOW and I suggest to Pupster21 to read the Criteria for Administratorship before nominating yourself again. Requesting adminship is not something to be taken lightly. · Tygrrr^·talk· 19:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose you don't meet requirements. Oysterguitarist 19:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose for the same reasons mentioned by Tygrrr. - Huji ^reply 20:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, sorry. However, in a few months time, you'll make a great administrator, and I thank you for offering to serve the community in this capacity :) Happy editing, ( arky ) 22:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose --§ Snake311 _{(T + C)} 03:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose per all of the above. Please read the criteria before re-nonimating. -- Spiderpig0001 Does whatever a spiderpig does! 21:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose not enough information to judge on a change of editor/admin status --°Barliner°******°talk° 21:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Hello there, I do have some observations. 78% of the edits are in main space; there are no deleted edits, and 1.27 edits per page seems reasonably low. The user has been around for over six months. Administratorship is about trust. Few people trust complete strangers. This is the problem here. At currently 42 edits [1], I feel getting the trust of the community might be a little hard. --Eptalon 12:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.