Project:Requests for adminship/Polymathsj
Appearance
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, request for checkusership, or request for oversightship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Polymathsj[change]
- Polymathsj (talk · contribs)
Final: (1/4/0). Closed early per WP:SNOW and WP:NOTNOW by Lauryn Ashby at 00:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC).'
RfA of Polymathsj |
---|
global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted |
Last comment by: imported>ShakespeareFan00. |
Ended: July 10, 2010
This user is now an active user who will continue to give time and service to the community.
With adminship powers, the user specified can be even more active and will be more motivated to edit.
Candidate's acceptance: self-nomination
Support[change]
- I have seen quite numerous edits by this user, and i support this request. I see that he is still improving, and is well-motivated. Empiresj1 (talk) 23:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Oppose[change]
- File:Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose With 96 edits and you only registered within the past day, you are not ready for adminship. Sorry. --Bsadowski1(Talk/Changes) 23:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- File:Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Bsadowski. Diego Grez let's talk 23:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- oppose This is not the English Wikipedia, this is simple. Only one day here. Please stay and gain some experience, but for now I would suggest an early closure.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. Kansan (talk) 00:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Comments[change]
Actually, I was using the English Wikipedia, though I wasn't as active as I am now. Polymathsj (talk) 00:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Polymathsj, you have made an admirable start to editing here. But there is still a lot to learn about the way things work here. One day is simply not enough to learn that, or for us to be able to judge your ability to handle the tools. You asked for rollback and did not get it, this should have been a sign that running for adminship would not be a good idea. Bear in mind that local experience is what matters because things are different on each project. I would suggest that you withdraw this RfA and review the guideline here. Regards, sonia♫♪ 00:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.