Project:Requests for adminship/Pakistan Celebrations

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Closed as unsuccessful per WP:NOTNOW. Only (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Pakistan Celebrations

Pakistan Celebrations (talk • changes • count • logs • page moves • block log • email)

End date: 06:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

The reason of my requesting for adminship is that I have many experience about wiki. I am capable to be an administrator of simple english wikipedia. I have extraordinary knowledge for using wikipedia like other admins. Therefore I requesting for adminship

Candidate's acceptance:

Oppose

• Oppose About a month ago your request for tools from the other account was closed as a NOT NOW case and it seems you did not bother to read it. From your contribution history of this account or of Yasir Mushtaq (talk · contribs) or Megabike (talk · contribs), it is very much evident that you have little knowledge of this project, how things work here and the policies here. Your use of multiple accounts may not have crossed the bright line (as it did on English Wikipedia) but it does not give me confidence that giving you admin tools will be beneficial. Your creation of multiple pages in user space, the same you created at English Wikipedia and were deleted as you were using them for promotional purposes again is something that I don't expect from an administrator. And your persistent violation of Behavior related policies on English Wikipedia and harassment of fellow editors does not let me have confidence in you as a user, whichever project you edit. -- Smsarmad (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose Putting aside the fact you requested it a month ago and the creation of pages with promotional purposes, You say you have a large knowledge of the policy's but just a few days ago you asked for a page to be deleted but the talk page kept. An administrator should know that talk pages are always deleted with the main page (unless it is a user page)--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 13:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose. Absolutely not, for reasons given above. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose per everyone else above, and also considering that you can't seem to follow instructions, since I observe that you yourself have decided to remove the {{rfp in progress}} template from this page. Chenzw  Talk  15:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.