Project:Requests for adminship/KingRaven44

KingRaven44

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, request for checkusership, or request for oversightship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

KingRaven44 (talk · contribs · count)

End date: 23:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

KingRven 44 has been on Wikipedia since fall of 2009 and I have seen him around almost everytime I am on Wikipedia. He has amassed hundreds of article creations and is always working out formatting and generally wikifying articles. I think that the mop would be a great help for his work. Cheers. Mìthrandir 23:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

• Candidate's acceptance: Accept. - (>ಠ_ಠ)>The King<(^.^<) (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Optional question from wiooiw (talk)

Q Would you ever block a user or IP who has not been given any warnings?

A:

Support

1. File:Symbol support vote.svg Support as nominator. Good luck... Cheers. Mìthrandir 00:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Good work on article creation, but I see very little anti-vandal activity. Also, I once saw him make a very questionable edit on Utah Jazz, claiming that the LDS Church owned part of the team (which is absolutely not true). I asked him about the edit and got no response. Kansan (talk) 00:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
2. Not now, I'm afraid. Echo some of Kansan's comments, whilst I'm also not 100% sure about you having the tools yet. Whilst I appreciate it's not a major issue, you also don't seem that 'active' and, to me, your name doesn't jump out as a 'regular' - but, as I say, not a major issue! Goblin 00:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC) I ♥ The Rambling Man!
3. WP:NOTNOW. Good article work, but next to no work in admin related areas and almost no participation in community discussion which is absolutely necessary for an admin. -DJSasso (talk) 01:03, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
4. Looking through the last five hundred edits, practically all of them were either new pages or minor. Participation in discussion, community or article related, is virtually nonexistent. And as a totally random, doesn't use edit summaries half the time. I couldn't find any edits or interaction that showed knowledge or experience with policies. All of that leads to a regretful NOTNOW. PrincessofLlyr ^talk 04:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
5. No: as per Princess. This wiki does not need borderline admins, and the applicant is not yet even borderline. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
6. I'm sorry to oppose, because you have done great content work in the wiki. However, I don't think you have sufficient experience in admin-y things like VIP, QDing, reverting vandalism etc. I don't see too much activity in the Wikipedia namespace (where all discussions take place) either. You are doing a good job, but you lack experience about admin related things. If you can address that concern, you will get a support from me. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
7. File:Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with how Pmlineditor stands. Hydriz^Talk 15:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
8. File:Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per pmlineditor snd princess. Not now. Bärliner 15:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
9. Oppose - Concerns with lack of countervandalism experience and not using edit summaries, as well as no activity in community discussions. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Sorry - is this nomination for you or for KingRven 44? The template is wrong :P --Addihockey10 ^e-mail 23:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

oops, my bad... I fixed it... Cheers. Mìthrandir 23:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.