Project:Requests for adminship/Alexanderbalvis
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Alexanderbalvis[change]
- Alexanderbalvis (talk · contribs · count)
| RfA of Alexanderbalvis |
|---|
| global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted |
| Last comment by: imported>ShakespeareFan00. |
End date: 12:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
i want to contribute to this wikipedia and help the primary goals . yes i accept this nomination Candidate's acceptance:'this is self-nomination for user : alexanderbalvis' yes i accept this nomination.
Support[change]
Oppose[change]
- Thanks for the interest, however not now. Please read the criteria for adminship. Maybe some day, if you can become active in this community.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the interest, but you made a single edit, and you were also blocked on en-wiki recently. Darubrub (Let me know) 19:10, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Comments[change]
- Gordonrox24 this request isn't transcluded on the RFP page, so should we still vote? --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 23:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Don't see why not. They've already accepted the nomination. Being able to figure out how to transclude it or not seems like a somewhat significant factor in whether or not you can support or oppose. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Gordonrox24 I see in this case they did accept, but see Djsasso's commment here --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Not sure I totally agree. If it's not live, the current requests for permission category should have been removed by the creator. It's really neither here nor there in cases as clear cut as this though. I'd be more worried about that if it were a long standing editor who was thinking about giving it a shot. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yea, this is an WP:SNOW, so even if I don't oppose, it will be a snow close either way. --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Not sure I totally agree. If it's not live, the current requests for permission category should have been removed by the creator. It's really neither here nor there in cases as clear cut as this though. I'd be more worried about that if it were a long standing editor who was thinking about giving it a shot. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Gordonrox24 I see in this case they did accept, but see Djsasso's commment here --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.