Project:Miscellany for deletion/New 1st lvl and 2nd lvl vandalism warning templates

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New 1st lvl and 2nd lvl vandalism warning templates[change]

I know and you know that the 1st and 2nd lvl warnings are very lame. We know that they don't experiment! The templates should be changed. ←Kala jan→ 21:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - per my reasons at simple talk. Don't ABF, Kalajan. Simon^KSK 22:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Comment - Noone uses wikipedia to experiment, I don't ABF but I use my common sense. It's really obvious. ←Kala jan→ 22:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

I find that preposterous. Imagine yourself as a new reader of Simple. You find out that theoretically, Simple can be changed by anyone. You click the "change" button to test this theory out. This does happen Kalajan. Shapiros 10 23:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per my reasons at Simple Talk. These templates have served us well for ages, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Kalajan, can I make a suggestion that you get stuck into some mainspace editing rather? Show us what you can do there, before getting too stuck into administrative affairs, just a friendly bit of advice ... fr33kman ^{t - c} 23:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Result was closed per SNOW. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.