Project:Requests for oversightership/EVula 2

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Successful. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 05:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

EVula

EVula (talk · contribs)

End date: 29 August 2009

Statement: I've been an administrator here for only a couple of months, but I've been an administrator on the English Wikipedia for more than two and a half years. More importantly, I've had Oversight access on en.wiki for more than five months, handling mailing list requests quickly and efficiently due to my day job, which has me by my email pretty much all day. I've already verified my identity with the WMF.[1] I'd like to bring my Oversight experience over to this project as well. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:33, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Questions

Q: You have various roles on various Wikis, as you've stated. Would you be able to commit enough time to this particular Wikipedia if you were made OS here as well? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

A: Because I'm by my email all day, I can jump on individual reports as they come in (assuming there's a mailing list, similar to the list for en.wiki, or if someone emails me directly) and am usually idling on AIM all day, so I can address oversightable items even if I'm not "checking" the project regularly (ie: looking at my watchlist or RC). Even when I'm less-than-active on enwiki, I still try to take care of Oversight requests if I get to them in time. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Support

1. Majorly talk 17:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
2. Missed-this-one support. Great candidate. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
3. Pmlineditor  Talk 17:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
4. I have already used you once at enWP. No problems with trust. Griffinofwales (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
5. Strong Support Ideal user for the position. Shappy ^talk 18:05, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
6. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:15, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
7. hmwithτ 20:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
8. NonvocalScream (talk) 20:15, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
9. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 21:02, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
10. fr33kman ^talk 21:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
11. Malinaccier (talk) 22:26, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
12. DerHexer (talk) 22:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC) hint
13. Absolutely. →javért ^stargaze 22:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

    File:Symbol support vote.svg Support No problems here. Razorflame 00:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

14. Based on community consensus. --§ Snake311 _{(I'm Not Okay!)} 03:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
15. why not --vector ^_^ (talk) 07:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
16. Support No reason not to Soup Dish (talk) 10:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
17. --M7 (talk) 20:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
18. David0811 (talk) 01:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
19. In the hope to end the drama; we need people to work with. I trust EVula in this, even though the user is active in many other projects--Eptalon (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
20. Definite yes. — RyanCross (talk) 08:47, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
21. Airplaneman ^talk 05:55, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
22. Support. Previous experience is something we can benefit from.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 14:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
23. Maxim_(talk) 23:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
24. Support. Already trusted with OS on en. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 04:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

    Support. Extensive OS experience on enWiki, excellent admin history. I wholeheartedly trust this user. Bullzeye (talk) 05:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

    Ineligible to vote. NonvocalScream (talk) 05:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

25. NonvocalScream (talk) 05:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

1. There are many people running today, some of which I would feel more comfortable as oversighter. —MC8 (b · t) 00:45, Monday August 10 2009 (UTC)
2. There are other candidates I trust more. Three OS are enough. Yotcmdr ^{=talk to the commander=} 08:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
3. This isn't really meant to be biast, but there are probably other users that I think are more better to vote for. иιƒкч? 11:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
4. File:Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Three or four OSes are enough, and this user is someone that I trust less than the other candidates. Razorflame 00:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• I'm not going to support or oppose, not that it will make any difference, due to my views that these elections are being improperly conducted. We should not be extending any time periods to get a required amount of votes - that's why we weren't going to start until September. I think we have some power hungry people wanting to get these started early... Goblin 13:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Nifky!

Sorry for replying here; this is just where I saw the comment. You do realise stewards are changing their rights here nearly every day these days? We were originally going to wait, but after the cesspool of oversightable nonsense that was coming to Simple, we decided to get the ball rolling. Power hunger didn't even feature in this decision, at all. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Struck the power hunger comment per what i've been told. I'm aware that oversight is needed, and I support /that/, I just don't support the way in which these elections are being held, and therefore it would be hypocritical of me to do anything other than comment. Regards, Goblin 13:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Fr33kman!

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.